Skip to main content

3.31.2011 Toad The Wet Sprocket at Higher Ground


We saw Toad The Wet Sprocket at Higher Ground last night. It was a great show. The last time they came to Higher Ground was apparently 15 years ago, before they had broken up. The band played a few new unreleased songs, as well as, of course, all of their most popular songs from the 90's. As a 6 piece, the arrangements and overall sound of the songs were pretty much exactly as they are on the albums, with the addition of lap steel and keyboard player Johnny Hawthorne to fill out the sound.


Dean Dinning's bass playing, as seems to be the hallmark of the rest of the band, is "tasty" yet subdued. If you watch him, he is all over the fretboard, doing tricky runs even while singing solid backup vocals, yet the overall effect of it on the music is very well placed and subtle. I recall his note and phrasing choices being something of an influence on me while I was (really) learning to play bass, in the late 90's. Dinning's gear for the show was either a Markbass or Eden head (a little hard to make out), going into a Markbass 4x10" cabinet, and his usual 6 string Warwick Thumb.

The really cool thing about the show was how laid back it was. Glen Philips (lead singer), Dinning, and Todd Nichols (guitar), were very conversational with the audience. I mean, literally just chatting back and forth with a few of the people up at the stage at a few points in the night. At one point a lady in the audience wasn't feeling too well, and they stopped to make sure she was alright, Philips handing her husband a bottle of water to give to her. Another time, when we were on line waiting to buy a t-shirt, the merch guy got up and left the booth for a minute to run up on stage and play cowbell. I forget what song it was, but it may have been "Fall Down".

Philips joked a couple of times throughout the show about the "high energy, heated rock-n-roll" that the show wasn't, with the band at one time breaking into a 2-beat shuffle spoof of "Crazy Train". But personally I appreciated the easy, informal presentation of the concert. It made the band more accessible and less "larger than life", an attitude that is probably much better suited to a band in this post-record-industry era.

Comments

Steve said…
Crap, tried to get caro there, no dice. I really envy you on this one.
Scott McGrath said…
We should have told you guys we were going, but it all happened so fast

Popular posts from this blog

Reaper, Linux, and the Behringer X-Air - Complete Studio Solution, Part 1

Introduction and Rationale This is part one of a major effort to document my experiences with recreating my home studio, entirely using Linux.  Without getting into too many of the specifics, a few months ago I decided that I was unhappy with Windows' shenanigans - to the point that I was ready to make a serious attempt to leave it behind.  For most in this situation, the obvious choice is to switch to Mac OS.  With its proven track record, support, and options for multimedia production, it is naturally the first alternative to consider if your goal is to simply use something other than Windows. For me the choice was not so simple. I despise Mac OS and, in general, the goals and philosophies put forth by Apple in an effort to ostensibly provide users with an "easy" working environment.  It does not help that I have also failed to find any aspect of the Mac OS UI intuitive, but I realize that this is a subjective matter. With my IT background and user-control* favori

An Alternative Take on AI Doom and Gloom

 I've purposely held my tongue until now on commenting about "AI" (or, more specifically as has come to be known, GAN or Generative Adversarial Networks).  It seems like it is very in-style to complain about how it has made a real mess of things, it is displacing jobs, the product it creates lacks soul, it's going to get smart and kill us all, etc. etc.  But I'm not here to do any of that. Rather I am going to remind everyone of how amazing a phenomenon it is to watch a disruptive technology becoming democratized From the time of its (seeming) introduction to the public at large, around November of 2022, to late 2023, the growth and adoption rate has been nothing short of explosive. It features the fastest adoption rate of any new technology ever, by a broad margin.  To give a reference, the adoption rate for AI image and text generation, real-world uses, in just 12 months is comparable to all of that of the another disruptive technology, the World Wide Web, takin

RANT TIME: Why do replies to a message I sent go to my spam folder?

Despite what one would think/hope, sending a message to a given address does not inherently give Google a high confidence that a reply from this address is expected (and, for example, that it should bypass spam checks). I have confirmed with Google's tech support that there is no way to automatically have this happen. The user can do the following: 1. Add the address to your contacts list in Gmail. 2. Check spam folder for replies, and mark it as "not spam" if something ends up there, which should influence the fate of future replies received. I can also approve an address at the domain level, i.e. if it is a big vendor or similar. I've had to do this with several of our Chinese vendors. I regularly ask engineering and purchasing to give me a list of the supplies we deal with, so I can approve them as a preventative measure. For what it's worth, all of the false positive instances of reply -> spam we have experienced have involved the sender's email server