Skip to main content

48V LiFePO4 Battery Repair, AKA: Something goes right for once this month

Amidst countless failures this month, most of which to do with my VW Golf, and will be saved for another post, I was successful at recommissioning my 48V bike battery.  And I'm pretty psyched about that, since a new one would have been well over $500 shipped.  Let's have a look at the story.

I disassembled my battery management system and soldered a wire tap onto the B1 terminal.  The theory was that if I could work on getting just the one cell up to voltage close to where the others sat, the battery pack would start operating "normally" again (instead of cutting out the moment I tried to use it, even right off charger).  I brought to "work" where there is a nice voltage AND current regulated, bench-top power supply.  The solution plan was simple: measure the current open circuit voltage of the rest of the cells, average it, set the power supply V to that, hook it between B- and B1 (the bad cell), and wait.



I soldered a wire to the second-from-right-most terminal, which is B1.
The cell started charging at about 1.5A, immediately, and slowly leveled off .  The pack voltage is seen on the left multimeter.
The cell started at 2.8V, with the power supply set to 3.6V (the nominal open circuit voltage on the other cells).  The current draw started around 1.5 amps, then slowly leveled off to 1 amp, and after about 5 hours it was down to .5 amps.  The open circuit voltage ended up around 3.2V before I ran out of time.

I then left it on charge via the bulk charger w/ BMS over night, with the hopes that the BMS would finally do the rest of the balancing.  I honestly have my doubts that it does any real balancing, however, and I really should consider a better BMS.

Anyway, long story short, I took the bike out and it ran beautifully!  The voltage barely sagged - even when riding uphill.  Under full load, it was down to around 45 volts.  My sense is that there is still a "runt cell", and I am going to invest in a nice power supply so I can maintain battery packs without having to use the one at work.  

Suffice to say that this mission was a success, and chalk up one win in a long list of losses, for the month of March.  Hopefully next month will be a little kinder.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reaper, Linux, and the Behringer X-Air - Complete Studio Solution, Part 1

Introduction and Rationale This is part one of a major effort to document my experiences with recreating my home studio, entirely using Linux.  Without getting into too many of the specifics, a few months ago I decided that I was unhappy with Windows' shenanigans - to the point that I was ready to make a serious attempt to leave it behind.  For most in this situation, the obvious choice is to switch to Mac OS.  With its proven track record, support, and options for multimedia production, it is naturally the first alternative to consider if your goal is to simply use something other than Windows. For me the choice was not so simple. I despise Mac OS and, in general, the goals and philosophies put forth by Apple in an effort to ostensibly provide users with an "easy" working environment.  It does not help that I have also failed to find any aspect of the Mac OS UI intuitive, but I realize that this is a subjective matter. With my IT background and user-control* favori
Post a Comment
Read more

An Alternative Take on AI Doom and Gloom

 I've purposely held my tongue until now on commenting about "AI" (or, more specifically as has come to be known, GAN or Generative Adversarial Networks).  It seems like it is very in-style to complain about how it has made a real mess of things, it is displacing jobs, the product it creates lacks soul, it's going to get smart and kill us all, etc. etc.  But I'm not here to do any of that. Rather I am going to remind everyone of how amazing a phenomenon it is to watch a disruptive technology becoming democratized From the time of its (seeming) introduction to the public at large, around November of 2022, to late 2023, the growth and adoption rate has been nothing short of explosive. It features the fastest adoption rate of any new technology ever, by a broad margin.  To give a reference, the adoption rate for AI image and text generation, real-world uses, in just 12 months is comparable to all of that of the another disruptive technology, the World Wide Web, takin
Post a Comment
Read more

RANT TIME: Why do replies to a message I sent go to my spam folder?

Despite what one would think/hope, sending a message to a given address does not inherently give Google a high confidence that a reply from this address is expected (and, for example, that it should bypass spam checks). I have confirmed with Google's tech support that there is no way to automatically have this happen. The user can do the following: 1. Add the address to your contacts list in Gmail. 2. Check spam folder for replies, and mark it as "not spam" if something ends up there, which should influence the fate of future replies received. I can also approve an address at the domain level, i.e. if it is a big vendor or similar. I've had to do this with several of our Chinese vendors. I regularly ask engineering and purchasing to give me a list of the supplies we deal with, so I can approve them as a preventative measure. For what it's worth, all of the false positive instances of reply -> spam we have experienced have involved the sender's email server
Post a Comment
Read more