Skip to main content

Gear review: Fender B-Dec 30 Amplifier


Today I'm going to review my Fender B-Dec 30. This assumes you've already perused the product literature and are already familiar with the features listed. If not, you can check it out on the Fender website. It's a small bass guitar amp, designed mainly for practice, but packed with features. I bought it new for around $350. I've owned it for a little over 2 years now, and have used it quite a bit for:


-Gigging with my upright bass (stage monitor)
-Gigging with my electric bass, with no drummer
-Rehearsals, campfires and impromptu jams (even with drummers)
-Practice and noodling around


Physical Aspects

Although the B-Dec was designed to be a practice amp, I have used it many times for gigs. It's small and light enough to be carried with one hand. I really love this: with a bass in the other, and a gig bag slung on your shoulder, you can walk into the gig in one trip. I also love the fact that it is a "kick back". I'm a big fan of putting the sound where you need it, and lowering the volume. No one has ears on the backs of their legs.

Controls

The controls, which are actually all encoders. This allows the settings to be stored and recalled in patches, which is pretty neat. The knobs all feel pretty sturdy and work well. The knobs don't stick out too much, so you don't really have to worry about them catching on anything.

Sound

Okay, it's not a tone monster, but it's solid. It sounds great throughout the entire volume range, and doesn't distort. It also holds down a very good bottom end throughout. I have been using it with a drummer for rehearsals and it is fine. I place the amp right behind the drummer.Volume-wise, let's say that if I ever turned it all the way up in my house, it would be pretty crazy. Not bad for 30 watts.


Bonus Stuff

Certain bonus features of the amp I frequently use, mainly the built-in tuner and the line out (which I plug into the mixing board). Incidentally, these are the things that convinced me to buy this amp in the first place.

The other doo-dads on the B-Dec, such as midi, back tracks, and FX, are neat, but I rarely use them. I do find them fun to play with when practicing. I thought I might use the RCA inputs, but not so much. The built-in backing tracks are actually helpful for doing certain kinds of drills. The phrase sampler, delay and reverb are inspiring when sitting around creating music.


Conclusion

When I first bought this amp, I was a little nervous - it was kind of an impulse buy, but I figured as long as it has a line out, tuner, and it sounds decent, I can do quite a bit with it. Well, I've actually ended up using this amp a lot more than I thought I would. As I mentioned, the B-Dec does way more stuff than I actually use, but they are not really the kind of things that get in the way. I definitely feel like I've gotten my money's worth, and would recommend it as a part of any active bass player's arsenal.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reaper, Linux, and the Behringer X-Air - Complete Studio Solution, Part 1

Introduction and Rationale This is part one of a major effort to document my experiences with recreating my home studio, entirely using Linux.  Without getting into too many of the specifics, a few months ago I decided that I was unhappy with Windows' shenanigans - to the point that I was ready to make a serious attempt to leave it behind.  For most in this situation, the obvious choice is to switch to Mac OS.  With its proven track record, support, and options for multimedia production, it is naturally the first alternative to consider if your goal is to simply use something other than Windows. For me the choice was not so simple. I despise Mac OS and, in general, the goals and philosophies put forth by Apple in an effort to ostensibly provide users with an "easy" working environment.  It does not help that I have also failed to find any aspect of the Mac OS UI intuitive, but I realize that this is a subjective matter. With my IT background and user-control* favori
Post a Comment
Read more

An Alternative Take on AI Doom and Gloom

 I've purposely held my tongue until now on commenting about "AI" (or, more specifically as has come to be known, GAN or Generative Adversarial Networks).  It seems like it is very in-style to complain about how it has made a real mess of things, it is displacing jobs, the product it creates lacks soul, it's going to get smart and kill us all, etc. etc.  But I'm not here to do any of that. Rather I am going to remind everyone of how amazing a phenomenon it is to watch a disruptive technology becoming democratized From the time of its (seeming) introduction to the public at large, around November of 2022, to late 2023, the growth and adoption rate has been nothing short of explosive. It features the fastest adoption rate of any new technology ever, by a broad margin.  To give a reference, the adoption rate for AI image and text generation, real-world uses, in just 12 months is comparable to all of that of the another disruptive technology, the World Wide Web, takin
Post a Comment
Read more

RANT TIME: Why do replies to a message I sent go to my spam folder?

Despite what one would think/hope, sending a message to a given address does not inherently give Google a high confidence that a reply from this address is expected (and, for example, that it should bypass spam checks). I have confirmed with Google's tech support that there is no way to automatically have this happen. The user can do the following: 1. Add the address to your contacts list in Gmail. 2. Check spam folder for replies, and mark it as "not spam" if something ends up there, which should influence the fate of future replies received. I can also approve an address at the domain level, i.e. if it is a big vendor or similar. I've had to do this with several of our Chinese vendors. I regularly ask engineering and purchasing to give me a list of the supplies we deal with, so I can approve them as a preventative measure. For what it's worth, all of the false positive instances of reply -> spam we have experienced have involved the sender's email server
Post a Comment
Read more